The city of Dayton, Ohio, placed black trash bags over its Flock automated license plate reader cameras following a controversy that started with an incorrect privacy setting and resulted in local vehicle information reaching federal immigration authorities. In Dayton and Evanston, Illinois, officials informed residents they could not immediately disable or remove the cameras due to contract restrictions. The trash bag served as the sole reliable option for both cities, offering a basic solution to an issue their agreements did not address directly.

These AI-driven systems capture license plates, note vehicle characteristics, monitor movements, and sometimes launch drones above residential areas. Dayton encountered a specific challenge on Wednesday: keeping the cameras inactive during contract termination talks. Officials responded by using ordinary black trash bags.

Governments in Dayton and Evanston applied garbage bags to Flock cameras after voting to end their agreements but prior to physical removal of the equipment.

This basic approach stops external groups from reaching recorded footage. It also draws attention to doubts about these monitoring tools and the difficulties local leaders face when trying to manage police department access.

Residents nationwide have pushed for Flock camera removals after learning that information has reached agencies like ICE, along with worries that police use the tools to follow people during private conflicts.

The cameras can recognize individuals by appearance or attire and let officers review travel patterns, which critics including Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden argue invites misuse. Additional reports have flagged placements near pools and youth activity centers.

Community Pushback Against Flock Systems

Dayton began its review after discovering that 72 Flock cameras had enabled thousands of searches tied to immigration matters. Police often skip logging the purpose of such queries.

The city paused the program, launched a complete review, and covered the cameras. The Dayton Police Department, Montgomery County Sheriff's Office, and nearby agencies have blocked public records requests from the Dayton Daily News concerning the audit and data use. They cite exemptions, though the newspaper challenges this stance.

Evanston directed Flock to take down its 19 cameras by 2025. Leaders later learned that only some units were removed and others were replaced without approval, leading to a formal cease-and-desist notice. The council then voted to end the entire system to limit further risks or expenses.

Support remains in some places. In Bandera, Texas, a council member expressed strong disappointment after the city dropped its Flock contract and even suggested limits on cell phones and internet access.

Flock Safety and the cities of Dayton and Evanston have not yet replied to comment requests.

Concerns About Local Flock Installations

Flock cameras may be set up by cities or neighborhood associations. Oversight often differs, and local leaders may lack full control over usage patterns.

These cameras typically feature a solar panel on top. Spotting one nearby may prompt checks with local news outlets or city staff to learn about current operations. Attending public sessions allows questions on surveillance efforts, and many areas permit records requests through open records rules.

Reviewing state and local camera regulations is useful since rules change by location. Compliance levels also vary, sometimes sparking complaints or legal actions. Residents in Boulder, Colorado, have sued over Flock camera deployment in their area.

Joining efforts like the Plate Privacy Project or reaching elected representatives can support new rules on these systems.

Detecting active Flock setups is not always straightforward. Some cities describe broad monitoring programs without naming Flock even when contracts involve their cameras or drones. The software may also connect to existing camera networks, so new hardware might not appear.