05 June 2026

Germany failed to win a non-permanent seat on the UN Security Council for 2027 and 2028. In the secret ballot at the General Assembly, Portugal and Austria reached the required two-thirds majorities with 134 and 131 votes, while Germany received support from only 104 states. The country normally puts forward such a candidacy every eight years. Media outlets review the causes of this setback.

Open/close all quotes

The Aargauer Zeitung links the outcome to Germany's image challenges since the Gaza war:

"Until now, Germany, one of the UN's largest financial contributors, had always won elections to the Security Council. It was primarily those regions of the world grouped under the term 'Global South' that let Berlin down this time: many emerging and developing nations had taken offence at the German government's relatively restrained criticism of Israel's conduct in the war in Gaza. By contrast, Portugal was able to point to its critical stance towards Israel and Austria to its neutrality. The failed candidacy certainly represents a loss of prestige for Germany."

Handelsblatt views the result as evidence that Germany's self-image as a trusted global actor is eroding:

"Germany of all countries, which likes to lecture the rest of the world on how there is no alternative to liberal Western democracies at every opportunity, is now unwelcome in the Security Council - the very body that, according to the UN Charter, is supposed to ensure peace and international security. This setback lays bare how Germany has overestimated its clout on the international stage. As many experts made clear in the run-up to the vote, the bid for the seat was doomed to fail. ... The bitter pill: Germany's voice carries less weight in the world than many are willing to admit - even though almost everywhere we are among the biggest financial contributors."

Die Welt shows little concern over the defeat:

"The United Nations has long since squandered its good reputation. It has become an organisation in which anti-Western, anti-Israeli and anti-democratic attitudes are often enough able to secure a majority. It has long since ceased to be a neutral peacemaker. ... The fact that the German government has reacted to the defeat not with anger but with composure is not a sign of weakness, but of wisdom. There is no shame in losing a vote within this United Nations. Of course, the time has come to speak openly about the structural imbalance that has long been a problem within the UN. And to consider how to remedy the problem."

The Salzburger Nachrichten highlights Vienna's sustained diplomatic work:

"Much suggests that this wasn't a vote against Germany, but in favour of Austria. ... Austria deservedly prevailed. It deserves this not only because the Foreign Ministry and the Austrian missions have put 15 years of work into the bid - consistently across various governments and foreign ministers. ... In its bid, Austria sought to give as many countries as possible - particularly smaller states - the feeling that it would better represent them on the Security Council. Apparently with success."

For Diena, the result signals a widening global divide:

"The decisive factor was the weariness with the confrontation between major geopolitical blocs and Western dominance, the manifestations of which are becoming increasingly unacceptable to the global majority, as non-Western countries are also known. They perceive Germany as a country whose foreign policy is inextricably linked to this agenda. So along with everything else, this vote reaffirms a new reality. The UN General Assembly is evolving into a platform on which the global majority expresses its dissatisfaction with Western policies, and Berlin's ambitions in this instance are coming up against that dissatisfaction."